On the other hand, in the "record of time for comprehensive inquiry", the entry fields are subdivided so that the learning activity, viewpoint, and evaluation are entered from the format that describes the current activity content and evaluation. I am.Here, it is required to briefly describe the learning activities performed by the students, the viewpoints of evaluation set by each school, outstanding characteristics, and what kind of power the students have acquired.This "record of time for comprehensive inquiry" seems to be different for each school, so if it is related to the application documents (reason for aspiration, recommendation, etc.) for comprehensive selection / school recommendation type selection, the university side Will be easier to evaluate (will the evaluation be higher?).

In addition, the "Remarks" column can still be requested by the university to describe excellent achievements in specific fields (health and physical education, arts, home, information, etc.), but these matters are still covered. It is expected that the applicant will submit the materials other than the survey form directly to the university.At first glance, this seems to reduce the burden on high school teachers, but it is expected that the burden on high school sites will not be significantly reduced because students will always ask the teacher for checks and opinions on the documents to be submitted to the university. increase.In any case, the current format will be completed in four years, and the amount of information in the enriched survey will be simplified again.You can check the new format on the website of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology below.

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology University Entrance Examination Information Site
(Attachment 2) Notice of revision of Reiwa 7th year university entrance examination implementation guidelines (PDF: 974KB)
https://www.mext.go.jp/content/20210729-mxt_daigakuc02-000005144_3.pdf

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Satoru Kobe (educational journalist)

Education Journalist/University Entrance Examination Writer/Researcher
After joining Kawaijuku Educational School in 1985, he has been engaged in collecting and disseminating university entrance examination information for over XNUMX years, and is also in charge of editing the monthly magazine "Guideline".
After retiring from Kawaijuku in 2007, he has been engaged in entrance examination work such as pass / fail judgment and entrance examination system design at a university in Tokyo, and is also in charge of student recruitment and public relations work.
After retiring from university in 2015, he worked as a writer and editor for Asahi Shimbun Publishing's "University Ranking" and Kawaijuku's "Guideline", and also contributed to Nihon Keizai Shimbun and Mainichi Newspapers.After that, he worked for a national research and development agency, and since 2016 has been consulting to support various issues at universities. KEI Advanced (Kawaijuku Group) conducts simulations and market trend surveys using entrance examination data, as well as formulating future concepts and medium-term plans, establishing new faculties, and supporting the design of entrance examination systems.
Click here for detailed profile