On the other hand, in the "record of time for comprehensive inquiry", the entry fields are subdivided so that the learning activity, viewpoint, and evaluation are entered from the format that describes the current activity content and evaluation. I am.Here, it is required to briefly describe the learning activities performed by the students, the viewpoints of evaluation set by each school, outstanding characteristics, and what kind of power the students have acquired.This "record of time for comprehensive inquiry" seems to be different for each school, so if it is related to the application documents (reason for aspiration, recommendation, etc.) for comprehensive selection / school recommendation type selection, the university side Will be easier to evaluate (will the evaluation be higher?).
In addition, the "Remarks" column can still be requested by the university to describe excellent achievements in specific fields (health and physical education, arts, home, information, etc.), but these matters are still covered. It is expected that the applicant will submit the materials other than the survey form directly to the university.At first glance, this seems to reduce the burden on high school teachers, but it is expected that the burden on high school sites will not be significantly reduced because students will always ask the teacher for checks and opinions on the documents to be submitted to the university. increase.In any case, the current format will be completed in four years, and the amount of information in the enriched survey will be simplified again.You can check the new format on the website of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology below.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology University Entrance Examination Information Site
(Attachment 2) Notice of revision of Reiwa 7th year university entrance examination implementation guidelines (PDF: 974KB)
https://www.mext.go.jp/content/20210729-mxt_daigakuc02-000005144_3.pdf