Click here for the previous article → "Is lecture required for active learning?'
Since the word active learning (AL) became widespread, I personally wonder.When the term "AL" refers to "a general term for teaching and learning methods that incorporate the participation of learners in active learning," is it AL that actively "makes" or "originally active" learning? The question is whether it is AL to guide people.If it is the former, the author holds that it may be a contradiction in terms of meaning when the leader says that the activity that should occur endogenously is "made" externally. It's a fundamental question.
It seems that some students are not so motivated in the lectures in the large-scale classrooms that I am in charge of, and that it is enough to get XNUMX credits.I don't say "do" to such students.If even the test results have reached a certain level that I impose, I try to give credits.On the contrary, for students who greedily absorb various knowledge, we recommend good books and give them further learning opportunities.The point is whether I can provide "something" that makes me want to learn more.
When the number of students exceeds three digits, it is rare that everyone has a very high level of motivation.Therefore, only the lower limit is clearly set, and the upper limit depends on the student (the person).In fact, I once imposed a report by telling in advance that "I will not reflect it in my grades, but I will return all submitted items with comments."This is because I decided that only students who want to improve their reporting ability and expertise should submit it. Of the 200 students, the average number of submitters was about 10.Of course, it goes without saying that the submitted report was carefully commented.